AMLA® to enhance AAT, Sandbox and Global Benchmark sanctions testing

Strengthen your sanctions testing with new AMLA® enhancements. Explore the updates →

AML Analytics will introduce several enhancements to AAT, Sandbox and Global Benchmark sanctions testing functionality from 8 August 2026, expanding the range of realistic name variations and manipulation techniques available for testing.
From 8 August 2026, new algorithms will be available for selection within the AMLA® Sandbox environment. These enhancements reflect common real-world variations observed in individual and organisation names across sanctions, watchlist and reference data sources.
The new algorithms will include:
These enhancements are intended to simulate realistic sanctions-circumvention techniques, helping customers evidence that their screening controls remain effective when presented with foreseeable non-standard naming scenarios.
The new algorithms will be introduced to Global Benchmark testing from 1 September 2026.
A new pre-defined algorithm template, General Distance 1 – Enhanced, will also be available to Sandbox customers within the Test Builder from 8 August 2026.
The template will provide a pre-configured selection of algorithm settings, reducing the need to configure each option manually and providing a consistent, repeatable baseline for sanctions screening tests.
The existing General Distance 1 template will remain available to support testing continuity.
The enhancements reflect evolving regulatory scrutiny, technological change and developments in data quality and naming conventions across jurisdictions.
By expanding the range of manipulation techniques available for testing, AMLA® will continue to help financial institutions independently assess and evidence the effectiveness of their sanctions screening systems.
In 2026, the FCA, HKMA, Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner and UAE CMA each found that sanctions screening systems detect exact matches but fail on manipulated names — and that accountability cannot be outsourced to the vendor. Here is what the four regulators now expect, and how to evidence that your screening meets the 2026 requirements.
The FCA assessed sanctions screening systems at over 150 UK financial services firms and found that systems missed one in four names containing minor variations. The most common root causes of sanctions breaches were weaknesses in screening, alert management, and due diligence. Firms must now demonstrate, with evidence, that their systems are tested, tuned, and effective.
Threshold calibration decisions can no longer sit quietly at the operational layer. With EBA guidelines now in force, financial institutions must show documented, risk-based evidence for how their sanctions screening systems are configured, and why. Here's what that means in practice.